<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>nsp-mapping</ui>
   <ji>gene-a</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>NSP Primer</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Locating Genes on Chromosomes</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Ingham</snm>
               <mi>W</mi>
               <fnm>Philip</fnm>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Whitfield</snm>
               <mi>T</mi>
               <fnm>Tanya</fnm>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <source>Genetics: The Functional Analysis of Genomes</source>
         <volume>6</volume>
         <issue>Mapping the Genome</issue>
         <fpage>2</fpage>
         <lpage>2</lpage>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>13</day>
               <month>11</month>
               <year>2002</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2002</year>
         <collab>New Science Press Ltd</collab>
      </cpyrt>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec num="6-3">
         <st>
            <p>The positions of genes on chromosomes can be determined using visible markers</p>
         </st>
         <p>As we have seen earlier, if two genes are located on different chromosomes, phenotypic traits associated with them assort independently, whereas if they reside on different copies of the same chromosome the coincidence of both traits in the same individual occurs less frequently than expected. In fact, in the absence of recombination, traits specified by two genes on different homologs will never segregate together. The degree to which two traits do co-segregate therefore tells us something about the occurrence of recombination between the respective genes and it is this property that allows us to map genes relative to one another along the chromosome. This is because the <b>frequency of recombination</b> that occurs between them during meiosis, is directly related to the physical distance separating the two genes on the chromosome. The greater the distance between the genes, the greater the probability that a chiasma will form between them. Thus calculating the frequency of recombination between genes allows the <b>genetic map position</b> along the chromosome to be calculated.</p>
         <p>Breeding experiments performed to determine the location of genes are known as <b>mapping crosses</b> and usually involve at least two markers on the same chromosome as the gene to be mapped. The example shown in <figr fid="F1">Figure 6-2.1</figr> illustrates the mapping of the <it>Antp</it> mutation relative to <it>Sb</it> and to another dominant marker on the same chromosome, <it>Lyra</it> (<it>Ly</it>; thin wings). First females heterozygous for the mutant-bearing chromosome and the marker-bearing chromosome are generated. Because <it>Antp</it> has been inherited from one parent and <it>Sb</it> and <it>Ly</it> from the other in this female, the <it>Antp</it> mutation is on a different copy of the homologous chromosome that carries <it>Sb</it> and <it>Ly</it> and is said to be <it>in trans</it> or in repulsion to these markers. The <it>Sb</it> and <it>Ly</it> mutations, by contrast, are on the same homolog and are said to be <it>in cis</it> or in coupling. Meiotic crossing over takes place in female <it>Drosophila</it>, so recombination will have occurred within the vicinity of these genes in a proportion of meioses in this fly, giving rise to recombinant chromosomes in which <it>Antp</it> is now linked to one of the markers. We can detect these recombination events by mating the female with a wild-type male and examining the phenotype of the progeny.</p>
         <fig id="F1">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 6-2.1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>
                  <b>Positioning genes on chromosomes</b>
               </p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p>The phenotypically triple mutant female in this cross (top left) is heterozygous for the newly induced dominant mutation <it>Antp</it>, inherited from one parent, and the dominant marker mutations <it>Sb</it> and <it>Ly</it>, inherited from the other parent (parents not shown): <it>Antp</it> is therefore on one parental homolog and <it>Sb</it> and <it>Ly</it> are on the other. In order to find the position of <it>Antp</it> relative to the known markers <it>Ly</it> and <it>Sb</it>, the female is crossed with a genetically wild type male (top right). The eight different phenotypes seen in the progeny of this cross are shown together with the genotype of the maternally-derived chromosome above each fly (the chromosome inherited from the male parent has been omitted for clarity) and the numbers of each phenotype indicated on the right. Most of the progeny (166/200) inherit one of the maternal homologous chromosomes in its original form and have either legs instead of antennae and wild-type wings and bristles, or have normal antennae, thin wings and short bristles. However other phenotypes are seen in the progeny as a result of recombination between the maternal chromosomes during meiosis. Of these, since <it>Antp</it> is located slightly closer to <it>Ly</it> than to <it>Sb</it>, a higher proportion (18/200) have either legs in place of antennae and short bristles with normal wings, or wild-type antennae and bristles with thin wings, while 14/200 have legs in place of antennae and thin wings with normal bristles or normal wings and wild-type antennae with short bristles. A much smaller number (2/200) of progeny are either wild-type or mutant for all three traits; these represent double recombination events. From these data we can deduce that <it>Antp</it> is located between <it>Ly</it> and <it>Sb</it>, (14+2)/200= 8% or 8 centiMorgans from <it>Ly</it> and (18+2)/200 = 10% or 10 centiMorgans from <it>Sb</it>.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="nsp-mapping-1"/>
         </fig>
         <p>The majority of the progeny of the cross have legs instead of antennae with normal wings and bristles or have normal antennae but shortened bristles and thin wings: each of these has inherited one or other of the parental chromosomes and they thus represent the so-called non-recombinant progeny. Flies that have inherited recombined forms of the original chromosomes, by contrast, manifest different combinations of the three mutant traits. Recombination between <it>Ly</it> and <it>Antp</it> gives rise to flies that are phenotypically antennapedia with thin wings and others which have short bristles, whereas recombination between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Sb</it> gives rise to flies with legs instead of antennae and short bristles and others with just thin wings. In addition, a small proportion of the progeny will inherit chromosomes that have undergone recombination between <it>Antp</it> and both markers; these will either be phenotypically wild type or will manifest all three mutant traits. To map the position of <it>Antp</it>, we first count the number of recombinant flies of each type and then add together those generated by recombination between the same pairs of genes. Thus 18/200 flies have either legs in place of antennae and short bristles with normal wings, or wild-type antennae and bristles with thin wings, reflecting recombination between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Sb</it>; while 14/200 have legs in place of antennae and thin wings with normal bristles, or normal wings and antennae with short bristles, reflecting recombination between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Ly</it>. The larger number of recombinants between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Sb</it> than between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Ly</it> reflects the fact that <it>Antp</it> is further from <it>Sb</it> than it is from <it>Ly</it>. To obtain the total number of recombinations between <it>Antp</it> and each of the markers, we must also add the rare double recombinants: there are two of these, giving 18+2 = 20 recombinants between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Sb</it> and 14+2 = 16 recombinants between <it>Antp</it> and <it>Ly</it>. To convert these numbers into standardized map distances, we express them as a percentage of the total numbers of flies in the cross, to generate the distance in map units known as <b>centiMorgans</b> (cMs) after the geneticist Thomas Hunt Morgan who worked out how to map genes. One cM is thus equivalent to the distance between two loci that show 1% recombination. In our experiment we can conclude that <it>Antp</it> is (14+2)/200 = 8 cMs from <it>Ly</it> and (18+2)/200 = 10 cMs from <it>Sb</it>. The order of the genes along the chromosome can be deduced by calculating the map distance between <it>Sb</it> and <it>Ly</it>. In our example, 18+14 flies show non-parental inheritance of these two markers, giving a map distance of 32/200 or 16 cMs between them. Since <it>Antp</it> is 8 cMs from <it>Ly</it> and 10 from <it>Sb</it>, it follows that it must lie between the two markers. Significantly, the distance between <it>Ly</it> and <it>Sb</it> calculated by summing the distance of each from <it>Antp</it> (10+8 = 18) is greater than the calculated value of 16 cMs. This is because the double crossovers - detected when scoring flies for all three markers - are not included when the segregation of only <it>Ly</it> and <it>Sb</it> is considered. This is an important factor to consider when constructing genetic maps: the more markers that are used, the more accurate the map.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec num="6-4">
         <st>
            <p>Molecular markers provide a flexible and efficient basis for construction of genetic maps</p>
         </st>
         <p>In organisms such as <it>Drosophila</it>, with its large number of marker mutations that manifest visible phenotypes, genes can be mapped simply by visual inspection of the progeny of mapping crosses. A more generally applicable method of mapping, essential in organisms that lack this wealth of visible marker mutations, exploits the existence of molecular polymorphisms between strains. Such polymorphisms are randomly distributed throughout genomes and can be used as molecular markers to construct genetic maps.</p>
         <p>Even in <it>Drosophila</it>, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are now commonly used for mapping. Comparisons of genomic sequences between different strains reveal SNPs at a relatively high frequency (around 1/200 base pairs between different strains of <it>Drosophila</it>). In many cases these abolish recognition sites for restriction enzymes and thus give rise to restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) that are readily detected by restriction digestion of the relevant PCR amplified fragment. Alternatively, SNPs can be detected by direct sequencing, mass spectrophotometry or single stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis (see Chapter 2). Mutations that result in a particular phenotypic trait - be it antennal transformation in <it>Drosophila</it> or a human disease model in fish or mouse - can be mapped relative to such molecular markers in exactly the same way that a trait is mapped using visible markers, as illustrated in <figr fid="F2">Figure 6-2.2</figr>, and explained in the legend.</p>
         <fig id="F2">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 6-2.2</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>
                  <b>Mapping genes with a molecular marker</b>
               </p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p>The female in this cross (top left) is heterozygous for the dominant mutation <it>Antp</it> and has also inherited a SNP from each of its parents, both of which abolish a restriction site (RS1 and RS2) in the DNA of the third chromosome. The male (top right) is wild type. Half of the progeny of the cross between these two flies have legs instead of antennae (left) and half have normal antennae (right). The length and number of restriction fragments produced by digesting the relevant region of the chromosome with RE1 (that cleaves DNA at RS1) and RE2 (that cleaves DNA at RS2) show that most of the progeny (166/200) inherit a maternal third chromosome in its original form and so retain either RS1 or RS2; most of the leg headed progeny (83/200) have RS1 (two lower molecular weight bands on gel after digestion of DNA with RE1) but not RS2 (single, higher molecular weight band on gel after digestion with RE2), whereas a similar proportion of flies with normal antennae inherit RS2 only (single, higher molecular weight band on gel after digestion with RE1; two lower molecular weight bands on gel after digestion with RE2). Some of the progeny carry both restriction sites (two lower molecular weight bands on gel after digestion with both RE1 and RE2), and some neither (single high molecular weight band on gel after RE1 and RE2 digestion). Since <it>Antp</it> is closer to SNP1 than to SNP2, a higher proportion of these will have leg heads and both restriction sites or normal antennae and neither restriction site (18/200), than will have normal antennae and both restriction sites or leg heads and neither restriction site (14/200). A small proportion of the progeny (2/200) have antennapedia and RS2, or normal antennae and RS1, as a result of recombination events between the maternal chromosomes during meiosis.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="nsp-mapping-2"/>
         </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Definitions</p>
         </st>
         <p><b>centiMorgan:</b> the unit of genetic map distance between two loci that show 1% recombination.</p>
         <p><b>frequency of recombination:</b> the number of cross over events observed between two linked loci expressed as a proportion of the total number of meioses sampled.</p>
         <p><b>genetic map position:</b> the location of a gene on the genetic map deduced from recombination frequencies.</p>
         <p><b>mapping crosses:</b> crosses in which recombination between molecular or visible markers and a gene of interest is assayed to calculate recombination frequencies.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Genetic mapping with SNP markers in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Berger</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Nat Genet</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>29</volume>
            <fpage>475</fpage>
            <lpage>481</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng773</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11726933</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morgan</snm>
                  <fnm>TH</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>The Genetics of Drosophila</source>
            <publisher>Garland, New York</publisher>
            <pubdate>1988</pubdate>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
